Will America Use Nuclear Weapons for the Second Time In Its History?

Absolutely Disgusting and Reprehensible!

By Helleniscope’s Editorial Team

Has humanity learned absolutely nothing from Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Are we once again approaching the terrifying possibility of an American nuclear attack, this time against Iran, at the urging of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu?

In an extraordinary statement posted on X on November 2 (at the bottom of this post), Tucker Carlson warned that President Donald Trump could be days away from authorizing a nuclear strike against Iran’s deeply buried Pickaxe Mountain nuclear facility, under intense pressure from Netanyahu. Carlson suggested that a decision could come by November 7, raising the horrifying prospect of radioactive devastation and a wider nuclear confrontation.

Trump publicly rejected nuclear use on October 12 – but who takes his statements seriously anymore? The possibility that nuclear weapons could become instruments of political desperation is morally obscene, strategically reckless, and utterly reprehensible.

Netanyahu’s Dangerous Legacy

Benjamin Netanyahu is no ordinary political leader facing routine criticism. The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant against him in November 2024, citing reasonable grounds to believe he bears responsibility for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, including starvation as a method of warfare, murder, and persecution. These allegations have not resulted in a conviction, but they represent an extraordinary indictment of his leadership.

After the devastation inflicted upon Gaza, the immense civilian suffering and the international outrage over Israel’s military conduct, the suggestion that Netanyahu might now be pressing Washington toward nuclear escalation is profoundly disturbing. If Carlson’s allegations are substantiated, they would reveal a breathtaking willingness to gamble with millions of innocent lives for strategic or political advantage.

Netanyahu also faces imprisonment for the corruption scandal he was involved in in Israel.  The only reason he is out of jail is that he holds the PM’s office.

No leader’s political survival, no military objective, and no strategic alliance can justify turning an entire region into a potential nuclear graveyard.

Is America’s Nuclear Arsenal at Netanyahu’s Disposal?

The United States is a sovereign nation, not an extension of Israel’s military establishment. Its nuclear arsenal must never serve another government’s political ambitions, particularly when the consequences could devastate the Middle East and destabilize the world. Can Washington exercise independent judgment, or will Netanyahu’s strategic calculations and the billionaires of AIPAC will influence a decision of unimaginable destructive magnitude?

America crossed the nuclear threshold in August 1945, devastating Hiroshima and Nagasaki despite objections to atomic warfare from senior military figures, including General Dwight Eisenhower. President Truman proceeded with the attacks, leaving a legacy of destruction that should remain humanity’s solemn warning, never a precedent for future wars.

A nuclear strike against Iran could spread radioactive contamination, kill countless civilians and shatter the restraint against nuclear warfare maintained since 1945, potentially emboldening other nuclear powers to follow America’s example.

Are we prepared to risk another Hiroshima simply because conventional bombs cannot reach a military target?

The World’s Shameful Silence

Where are the United Nations, the defenders of international law and the governments that endlessly proclaim their commitment to peace? Above all, where is the American Congress, whose duty to challenge reckless decisions becomes paramount when nuclear weapons are involved?

The international community must demand clarity from Washington, reject nuclear escalation and insist upon diplomacy. Netanyahu must face accountability under international law, not receive a blank check for further military confrontation.

President Trump must recognize that history would judge an American nuclear strike with extraordinary severity. The lives of Iranian children, the security of neighboring nations and the future of humanity cannot be sacrificed to satisfy any leader’s political ambitions.

America does not need another demonstration of its destructive power; it needs the moral courage to exercise restraint. 

Mr. President, do not turn Iran into another Hiroshima or allow Netanyahu—or anyone else—to drag America toward nuclear catastrophe.

History will ask not merely who ordered such an attack, but why those with the power to prevent it remained silent. The voters understand their responsibility and they will definietely show it in tomorrow’s elections.

November 2, 2026, www.helleniscope.com, n.stamatakis@aol.com

DISCLAIMER: The views and statements expressed in this article constitute constitutionally protected opinions of this author.

TO SUPPORT HELLENISCOPE OR BECOME A SUBSCRIBER, LINK HERE!!

======================

TUCKER CARLSON’S POST ON “X”

Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate.

After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations, and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are Democratic Party leaders. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran.

The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, about 850 supertankers transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed.

No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.

Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. Right now, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran is possible. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.