As We Are Waiting for Tyler Robinson To …”Commit Suicide”…

ΕΑΝ ΠΡΟΤΙΜΑΤΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ ΠΑΤΗΣΤΕ ΤΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ ΣΤΟ ΚΑΤΩ ΜΕΡΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΘΟΝΗΣ

By Helleniscope’s Editorial Team

We will try to summarize the many holes in the FBI’s “official narrative” about the Charlie Kirk assassination.  You can also watch an interview of former CIA analyst Larry Johnson with Clayton And Natalie Morris of “Redacted” at the end of this post… It is followed by an expert ballistic analysis by Chris Martenson – also posted on sonar21.com by Larry Johnson… The evidence is so convincing and so overwhelming that the question arises effortlessly: THERE IS NO WAY FOR ANY COURT TO FIND TYLER ROBINSON GUILTY.  THEREFORE, THE POWERFUL INTERESTS BEHIND THIS CRIME WILL HAVE TO … SUICIDE HIM…. VERY MUCH LIKE THEY DID WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN….

Meanwhile, countless pieces of evidence are piling up disproving practically every single claim made by the FBI… The funniest of all is the dialogue between Tyler and his gay partner – everyone can tell it was “scripted” – how stupid does the FBI think we all are? (link here).

• The Official Story: The FBI claims a lone gunman, Tyler Robinson, fired a single shot from a roof using a bolt-action rifle and then fled the scene, casually stopping at a Dairy Queen. The family of Tyler Robinson reportedly turned him in, and he confessed.

• The Dairy Queen: The existence of the Dairy Queen is questioned in the video. A “closed” sign was reportedly removed from the location, and the building appears to have been altered or removed altogether. This raises questions about the accuracy of the timeline and evidence presented.

• The Renovation of the Crime Scene: The area where Charlie Kirk was shot was immediately renovated by the university, including new cement slabs and reworking the ceiling. This rapid alteration of the crime scene could have compromised any physical evidence that might have been found.

• The Gunshot: A significant issue raised in the video is the nature of the gunshot. The shooter supposedly used a .30-06 rifle, but the ballistic effects of that caliber would likely have caused much more damage. The wound that killed Charlie Kirk did not match the expected effects of a .30-06 round, which should have caused much more destruction, potentially severing the head or causing massive trauma.

• Ballistic Evidence: Experts in the video, including Larry Johnson, point out that videos and simulations of the .30-06 bullet’s power show it would have caused significant damage, including shattering bones. However, the actual wound on Charlie Kirk seemed inconsistent with what would be expected from such a powerful round. Instead, a different type of bullet, like a .300 Blackout or a smaller NATO round (such as the 5.56), might explain the effects seen on the victim.

• The Video Evidence: There are issues with the video footage, such as the apparent disappearance of people in the background and the absence of footage showing Tyler Robinson firing from the roof. Additionally, the shadow of the shooter disappears at one point, suggesting that the video may have been tampered with or edited.

• The Wound and Blood Loss: According to the video analysis, the wound that killed Charlie Kirk did not exhibit the typical arterial spurts expected from a shot to the neck. Instead, the video shows a strange “flood” of blood down his neck, suggesting that the bullet might have created a cavitation effect, potentially causing internal organ damage, especially to the heart. This raises questions about the type of weapon used and the trajectory of the bullet.

• Assassination Theory: The assassination was not a random act but part of a political message. There is speculation that the assassination might have been engineered to provoke division or unrest between political factions, potentially playing into larger narratives about government control and surveillance.

• The Handling of the Investigation: The crime scene was mishandled by law enforcement, with the FBI failing to secure it properly. The evidence presented by the authorities was inconsistent, and there were multiple stories released over time. This lack of transparency and changing accounts suggests that there may be deliberate efforts to obfuscate the truth.

• Disinformation is being used to confuse the public. The changing narratives and inconsistent reports about the events surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death suggest that there may be a concerted effort to control the narrative and prevent the public from asking critical questions.

FOLLOWED BY THE EXPERT BALLISTIC ANALYSIS BY CHRIS MARTENSON

September 30, 2025, n.stamatakis@aol.com   www.helleniscope.com

DISCLAIMER: The views and statements expressed in this article constitute constitutionally protected opinions of this author.

TO SUPPORT HELLENISCOPE OR BECOME A SUBSCRIBER, LINK HERE!!