EDITOR’S NOTE: Among many other instances of fraud to be contested in court the case of Wisconsin is massive… The official voter participation in WI is 90% – a statistically impossible number!! The probability of this being accurate (without fraud!!) is 1 in 23 million!! Please listen to an excellent statistician, my son Andreas Stamatakis, expose the fraudsters!! THIS IS FRAUD AND PEOPLE NEED TO GO TO JAIL….
November 4, 2020, n.stamatakis@aol.com www.helleniscope.com
Voter Fraud thy name is Democrat!
One thing we can depend on with liberals – endless criminality & perversion & that embodies feeble Joe Biden to the Max
The article in this link suncinctly explains why the 2020 Wisconsin voter turnout was actually 71% not 89%.
https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/verify/verify-wisconsin-turnout-not-massively-larger-than-normal/507-ac05b2f4-fdfe-4bc5-91d5-7a22496c3314
Timmy: The author of this article clearly lacks in math ability… And if it is true that WI determines the percentage not on registered voters but on eligible voters then they are mathematically deprived… Because they cannot have an accurate number of eligible voters… Here is how Kimberly Strassel answered this:
1) I am legitimately interested/confused by this. I checked, and the top number is indeed Wisconsin’s active registered voter number as of Nov. 1. The bottom is approx. what has been counted. That is a (not feasible) 89% turnout.
2) The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is claiming a 71% state turnout. I’m not sure where it gets this, but that would make more sense, given even populous Milwaukee didn’t exceed 83% turnout, and Dane lower. (Do math on what rest of state wud need to bump up state avg to 89)
3) True, Wisconsin has same day voter registration. But to be at 71%, WI would have yesterday needed 900k same-day registrations. ( If I’m doing my math wrong–please tell me. 3,288,771 divided by 4,588,771 equals 71% . 4,588,771 minus 3,684,726 =900k)
4) Is that possible/conceivable? That would be akin to increasing WI’s registered voting population by up to 30%–in one day. It would also suggest that if those same-day registrations hadn’t happened, WI would have had a ridiculously LOW turnout.
5) I suppose it is possible WI’s turnout was higher than 71% (again, not sure where MJS gets that). But that would be wild, given the state’s own history and what we saw elsewhere yesterday. An even an 80% turnout would still require HUGE same-day registration.
6)Surely a record/tally of those same-day registrations must exist. It would therefore seem a straightforward proposition to set the numbers/record straight?
Again, explain if I’m missing something. @WI_Elections
7) So, more. I compared some vote totals to voter registration–by county. Nearly every county i’ve looked at so far–left and right–registered turnout of 89% or higher. (several at 93%) I suppose its possible–but still seems extraordinary.
8) I think high voter turnout is great, and if WI truly did this, wow. I only question it because it is so strikingly at odds with any other state.
9)One thing that makes more sense is if MSP number of 71% if referring to voting-eligible population (rather than registered voters). But still, wow–89% turnout of registered voters….