ΕΑΝ ΠΡΟΤΙΜΑΤΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ ΠΑΤΗΣΤΕ ΤΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ ΣΤΟ ΚΑΤΩ ΜΕΡΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΘΟΝΗΣ
What’s Changed: The 2025 NSS Signals a Strategic Pivot
By Helleniscope’s Editorial Team
For many years, Helleniscope has insisted that the cartoonish framing of Russia as an eternal American adversary ignored both history and hard reality.
From the American Revolution to WWII, the U.S. and Russia have aligned repeatedly when strategic interests converged. Yet since the late 1990s, Washington’s bipartisan foreign-policy class treated Russia as a permanent threat — while refusing to acknowledge that Moscow was the most self-sufficient major power on Earth and decades ahead in missile technology.
We argued, long before Ukraine exploded, that Russia was not a geopolitical vassal but a strategic actor — a nation that the U.S. could sometimes cooperate with rather than perpetually confront. The destruction of Rex Tillerson’s Arctic mega-deal with Rosneft — the largest energy exploration project in human history — was Exhibit A: the American “National Security establishment” sabotaged business opportunities that did not fit its ideological template.
Finally: “Russia Is Not An Enemy!!”
In recent days, for the first time in a generation, U.S. foreign policy appears to move away from the reflex of treating Russia as a permanent antagonist. The new NSS does not rely on bombastic rhetoric — instead, its priorities, tone, and structural assumptions reflect a different framework.
The NSS places top priority on the Western Hemisphere — indicating the U.S. will scale back its traditional emphasis on Europe. Council on Foreign Relations+2The Washington Post+2
It frames ending the war in Ukraine as a vital U.S. interest, rather than continuing a protracted conflict. The Kyiv Independent+2The Ridgefield Press+2
It endorses “restoring strategic stability with Russia” — signalling a willingness to re-engage diplomatically, rather than forever isolate Moscow. Council on Foreign Relations+2The Telegraph+2
In Europe, the NSS rejects the endless expansion of NATO and urges European partners to assume responsibility for their own defense. Los Angeles Times+3Council on Foreign Relations+3The Telegraph+3
In short, the NSS pivots from moral-crusade containment to realist strategic balance.
Implications: Russia as Strategic Actor, Europe Demoted, Hemisphere First
Under this new doctrine, Russia is treated not as a pariah or ideological enemy — but as a permanent, industrial, strategic actor: large, resilient, and impossible to simply “erase.” The U.S. appears ready to negotiate, not indefinitely isolate.
That recognition rewrites long-standing assumptions: Russian strength — economic, energy, military — can no longer be ignored in favor of ideological posturing. Engagement becomes plausible.
Meanwhile, Europe loses its status as the axis of U.S. global strategy. The U.S. effectively tells its allies: “We’re moving on. Strengthen yourselves.” The Western Hemisphere becomes the focal zone — a modern reprise of a “Monroe Doctrine”-style realist foreign policy. The Washington Post+2Council on Foreign Relations+2

What This Shift Could Enable
If this shift lasts:
Reset with Russia is possible — diplomatic engagement, arms control revisits, recognition of spheres of influence.
Europe may rearm, reorganize, or fracture — obliged to defend itself, perhaps even reconsider alliances.
The U.S. might refocus on other theaters (Indo-Pacific, hemisphere, domestic readiness) — globalization and ideological interventions may recede in favor of strategic interests.
What This Means: Realism Is Back — In Policy, Not Just Theory
The 2025 NSS appears less like a new ideological crusade and more like a return to realpolitik — where geography, power, resources, and stability define strategy.
For the first time in decades, an American National Security doctrine implicitly acknowledges:
Some rivals must be negotiated with, not demonized.
Global ambitions must be balanced with regional and hemispheric priorities.
Military and ideological policing of Europe is no longer an American burden.
In other words — Washington has finally come to its senses.
December 5, 2025, n.stamatakis@aol.com www.helleniscope.com
DISCLAIMER: The views and statements expressed in this article constitute constitutionally protected opinions of this author.




“”a permanent, industrial, strategic actor: large, resilient, and impossible to simply “erase.” The U.S. appears ready to negotiate, not indefinitely isolate.””
Nick. The Wedst neverf wanted to “erase Russia”. As your ewditorial noted, its the largest nation on earth, and it has plenty of resources. Before America was a world power, England was pre eminent. The British always were antogonistic to Russia. Because of India mostly, but also because Russia was never a good fit for Western Europe. The Krimean war cut Russia down to size, because her march into Paris , during the Napoleonic wars, had caused her to get too sure of herself.
During WWII, the USSR acted like a clownish mafia state. They split Poland with Hitler. Churchil hated Russia for her pact with Hitler and was elated, when Hitler attacked Russia. And Russia was begging for help from the UK, which at first couldn’t do much, until America joined the fray.
Then, during the xold war, Russia and the West were virtual enemies, fighting each other with proxies. After Russia’s loss in the cold war, she went to the extreme opposite. With Putin as the new Czar.
Then, after loss of vast territoriers of mostly Moslem States, plus the former sattelites’ of Eastern Europe joining Europoe, wanting nothing to dso with Russia—and who can blame them—Russia’s grabbed pieces of Georgia and turned to Ukraine.
You can’t blame the West. No one took any tyerritory from Russia. Russia did that. You can’t blame Europe for being suspicious
As for America, it is Trump and the MAGAverse, who have talked themselves into admiring Russia because of autocracy, religious fanaticism, anti-gay rhetoric, oligarchic rule, strongmen-mafia-like individuals and the ongoing war with Ukraine. Which war attracts a small band of “born warriors”
MAGA will not last forever. Trumpl has chased away allies and befriended criminals. I hope America has not lost her way.
Your approach is misguided. What Putin did in the last 25 years was to guide Russia back to its cultural roots, to Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky – to Orthodoxy. Among other things he supported the family as an institution and they built 30,000 churches – quite an accomplishment after 70 years of communism… On the opposite America moved away from its conservative roots and particularly away from meritocracy… This explains much of the defeat in Ukraine. It was America’s defeat: don’t forget that the military operations were always guided by an American control center in Germany (Wiesbaden).
Are you serious? I think a basic review of the historical literature will change your mind. Russia has withstood invasion after invasion over the centuries… Ottomans Persians Swedes Poles Lithuanians Germans those French…and the bolshevik revolution was designed planned and carried out by western bred liberals…turned Marxist. The last invasion was from the US when it attempted to directly engineer—Russia’s transition to a corporate-capitalist, market-driven economy. Remember the “Harvard boys”? Using aggressive economic “shock therapy,” political manipulation, and mass privatization schemes, effectively invaded Russia’s sovereignty without tanks—collapsing its economy, empowering oligarchs, and reshaping the nation to serve Western corporate interests.
This period is now widely viewed (even in Western scholarship) as one of the most intrusive economic interventions in modern history.
Bob, you’re quite mistaken. Ever since the 90s, the “Brzenski doctrine” was in play. It’s fundamental tenet was to break up the Russian Federation into five or seven independent nations.
George.
Russia’ enormous territory was aquired as the British and all the other imperial powers aquired their colonies. By conquering them. The imperial powers have given up their colonies. Why shouldn’t Russia give up hers?All the “stan” nations” were colonies. Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine, the Baltic nations, even a slice of Finland were colonies of Russia. They wanted their independence. I don’t blame them for wanting to set their own course. Did the West wanted Russia to break up? Sure they did. Just as they wanted to break up Germany and Japan, after WWII. All countries are looking out for themselves. And that’s how it is. They would be traitors to their own people if they didn’t.
Look at the Ottoman empire. Austia-Hungary. They were broken up intto numerous nations. Greece gained her independence with the help of G.B, France and Russia. Russia wanted to break up the Ottoman empire.
Of Christian, Russia is not an enemy. The United States is the enemy. No country and its proxies:puppets persecutes Orthodoxy and Orthodox Christians more than the U.S. and its proxies/puppets.
Leaving aside the reality of vast wealth in natural and human resources, Russia is the preeminent guardian of traditional values—family, faith, cultural continuity, and a shared moral framework—while the modern West suffers from excessive individualism, consumerism, moral relativism, and social fragmentation.
Russia’s emphasis on spiritual life, historical memory, and national duty offers a counterweight to Western decadence. And more importantly I would argue that genuine authoritarianism today resides NOT in Russia but in the LIBERAL WEST, where vast bureaucracies—political, financial, technological, and military—quietly shape public life. These institutions operate with minimal democratic accountability, consistently privileging corporate expansion, consumer dependency, and the use of war or foreign intervention and intrigue– those color revolutions bought and paid for by soros and his cabals to open markets for corporate products. The result is a system that calls itself “free,” yet functions through concentrated power, manufactured consent, and economic coercion—an authoritarianism of bureaucracy rather than ideology.
A deeper U.S.–Russia engagement could help restore a sense of moral seriousness in American life.
George Kanenas.
Give me an example of Orthodox being persecuted here in America for ebing Orthodox..
Bob,
I know a person who got written up for termination after he was illegally denied personal leave to take Orthodox Good Friday off…The employer was a public state university and it clearly states that employees can take a certain quota of “personal days” for religious reasons. The manager who violated both University policy and other labor laws still works there, but the person I know doesn’t…does this example count?
This is clearly discrimination based on religion. If the rules state that you are allowed days off for religious purpose, then they should have given him the day.
However, this type of discrimination is faced more often by Jews and Moslems. There is a simple remedy. Sue them. If that person lost his job due to religious observance, it is against the rules of the school itself. He has a case that any lawyer would be happy to take and make a good payday out of it. Did he sue them? You’re not saying.
I hope this reality and realization will save Czech Republic and Ukraine OCs from further defamation and attacks from being accused of being under “Russian influence.” to being closed down. The OCs in both countries are today crucified along with their faithful. And of course, any logical person, sees by now that the forced “autocephaly” in Ukraine failed miserably. Looks like the Czech republic autocephaly is also failing.
Interesting to note that although in Czech republic autocephaly was given under different circumstances, they are still accused for being under russian influence, so Barto solved nothing to get them out of the “Russian influence”. Sounds like someone doesn’t like them. Not sure why. They probably refused to bow to Barto. But it is clear he doesn’t know what he is doing and his autocephalous do not work and do more harm and problems than it solves. 2 autocephalies. 2 failures. He should just step down. He is destroying the church.
The tone deafness of the EP and those that do its bidding is quite literally astounding and should be studied by psychologists.
They could call it Fanariot Syndrome
This article essentially says “no one likes what we are doing with Ukraine and Rome…so they’re all Russian KGB assets…including most of the Orthodox World”
These ppl are a bunch of morons
https://orthodoxtimes.com/a-meeting-in-the-emirates-plotting-a-rift-with-the-phanar/