ΕΑΝ ΠΡΟΤΙΜΑΤΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ ΠΑΤΗΣΤΕ ΤΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ ΣΤΟ ΚΑΤΩ ΜΕΡΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΘΟΝΗΣ
OUR MAIN PHOTO: The funeral of Monk Varsonofiy Turianskyi
A Greek utility, a $100,000 Hamptons “Blue Dream” / “Blue Nightmare” sponsorship, Washington lobbyists and a growing network of intermediaries raise a simple question: what exactly is PPC buying in America?
By Nick Stamatakis
There is something unsettling about seeing Greece’s historic electricity utility among the top sponsors of an exclusive Hamptons gala.
On August 29, the Greek-American establishment gathers in Southampton for Blue Dream, the annual event associated with Father Alexander Karloutsos. At the highest sponsorship tier—$100,000+—the official website lists only three underwriters. One is “Public Power Company, USA.” (link here).
That is ΔΕΗ/PPC.
For generations of Greeks, ΔΕΗ / PPC was the electricity company, not an abstract corporation. Today it is a listed multinational group, but the Greek State still owns a major stake and very recently invested €1.289 billion in its 2026 capital increase.
So what, exactly, is PPC paying for in the Hamptons?
According to information provided for this story, senior executive Alexandros Paterakis is attending Blue Dream. That detail has not yet been independently confirmed by a published photograph or guest list, but the broader pattern is documented.
PPC established PPC North America Corporation in Delaware in December 2025 to promote the company in the United States and pursue partnerships with American businesses. Its initial capital was only $5,000, which PPC reported had still not been paid by June 2026.
Yet the American operation quickly moved into influence-building. PPC North America hired Washington lobbying firm Catalyst Strategies, with federal records showing $30,000 in lobbying income in the first quarter of 2026. Now a PPC-branded entity appears at Blue Dream’s $100,000+ level.
That sequence suggests PPC’s American strategy is not simply about energy projects. It is also about relationships.
Blue Dream offers exactly those relationships. Its organizers and committee include John Catsimatidis, Dennis Mehiel, Michael Psaros and Father Alexander Karloutsos, whose network spans Greek-American business, philanthropy, the Orthodox Church and political power in Washington and Athens.
Karloutsos has spent decades operating in that world and has documented ties to successive U.S. administrations as well as to Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and the Greek political establishment.
None of this proves wrongdoing. But neither is it meaningless.
A company does not ordinarily spend six figures at a Hamptons event because it needs electricity expertise. It does so because the room itself has value.
Paterakis’s role fits that strategy. He is not PPC’s CEO—that is Georgios Stassis—but he is one of the company’s most senior executives in digital and advanced services. His background in telecommunications, international technology, California and Silicon Valley venture capital aligns with PPC’s effort to reinvent itself as a “powertech” group focused on AI, data centers, fiber, telecoms and digital infrastructure.
Perhaps PPC is not looking for an American power plant. Perhaps it is seeking something less tangible and potentially more valuable: access to investors, hyperscalers, technology executives, policymakers and the intermediaries who can open those doors.
This is where the story becomes more troubling.
Information provided for this article alleges that PPC’s spending on influence extends beyond the registered Washington lobbyists visible in federal databases. According to those claims, the company is allegedly paying substantial monthly sums to additional consultants and individuals in Washington and Athens who function as “pseudo-lobbyists” or political intermediaries, with several allegedly linked directly or indirectly to the wider Karloutsos network.
Because of its nature, this information is not yet verified. But if true, they raise a much larger question than the cost of one Hamptons table: is PPC channeling significant sums through politically connected advisers whose precise services, contracts and results remain largely invisible to the public?
Who are these consultants? How much are they being paid? What does “promoting PPC’s goals” actually mean? Who approved the contracts, and what measurable commercial benefit has PPC received?
If such retainers are documented, Blue Dream / “Blue Nightmare” begins to look less like an isolated charitable sponsorship and more like one visible piece of a broader influence strategy.
The political backdrop adds another layer. Paterakis joined PPC’s board in August 2019, shortly after Kyriakos Mitsotakis became prime minister, while PPC remained majority state-controlled. The more relevant question is not bloodline but network: who backed Paterakis, who brought PPC into these circles, and how has that network developed since 2019?
The money matters because PPC is not an ordinary private company. The Greek State still owns 33.4%, and only months ago invested €1.289 billion in it.
That does not mean taxpayers directly paid for Blue Dream. PPC also has customer revenues, private investors and debt financing. But the public has every right to know whether significant corporate funds are being spent on lobbyists, advisers, intermediaries, sponsorships and political access—and what shareholders are receiving in return.
The contrast is hard to ignore. Greek households continue to struggle with electricity costs far above pre-crisis norms, while the company historically synonymous with their power bills is spending money to establish itself in Washington, Silicon Valley and the Hamptons.
Perhaps this strategy will bring investment, technology and jobs back to Greece. If so, PPC should be able to explain how.
Who authorized the Blue Dream sponsorship? Which PPC entity paid it? Who occupied the VIP seats? How much is PPC paying in total to lobbyists, consultants and intermediaries in Washington and Athens? How many are connected to the Karloutsos network, and what measurable value are they delivering?
Those are transparency, governance and the use of corporate funds in a company still heavily owned by the Greek State.
So what does Mr. Paterakis—and PPC—want in the Hamptons?
Perhaps not electricity.
Perhaps access, influence and a seat at the right table—and the real story is how much PPC is willing to pay for it.
August 29, 2026, www.helleniscope.com, n.stamatakis@aol.com
DISCLAIMER: The views and statements expressed in this article constitute constitutionally protected opinions of this author.
