EDITOR’S NOTE (Nick Stamatakis). Demosthenes Davvetas has argued in a book presented in this video that Napoleon Bonaparte had Greek roots, basing his view primarily on historical, cultural, and linguistic grounds:
Corsica and Greek influence
Davvetas notes that Corsica historically lay within zones of strong Greek influence (via Magna Graecia and broader Mediterranean Greek presence). He suggests that Greek-origin families settled there and assimilated over time, which could—hypothetically—apply to Napoleon’s lineage.The surname “Bonaparte”
He proposes that the name Bonaparte may not be purely Italian or French, but a linguistic transformation of an older Greek form through centuries of Mediterranean language shifts. Davvetas suggests that Napoleon’s line descents from the Byzantine Emperors Komninoi who escaped to Mani (near Sparta) and then to Europe…Napoleon’s philhellenism
Davvetas highlights Napoleon’s admiration for ancient Greece, classical education, and Greek-inspired strategic thinking, interpreting this not merely as standard Enlightenment education but as a sign of deeper cultural affinity.Greek dimension of European identity
On a more philosophical level, he argues that Napoleon embodied a Greek model of leadership (law, measure, rational strategy). Even without proven biological descent, Davvetas claims a spiritual and cultural Greek lineage.Critique of official historiography
Finally, he contends that mainstream historiography often downplays the Greek contribution to Europe’s formation, and that Napoleon’s case reflects this broader historical neglect.
THIS IS A FASCINATING VIDEO WITH ENGLISH SUBTITLES
========




Napoleon the Great? In all my years, I’ve never heard Napoleon being referred to as the Great.
More like Napoleon the misguided miscreant plunderer who happened upon the bloody post revolutionary French scene.
When it is no longer possible to stretch those so very elastic threads of the historical rationale any further, when an action is manifestly contrary to all that humanity calls right or even just, the historians resort to the device device of “greatness.” “Greatness” would appear to exclude the standards of right and wrong. For the “great” man nothing is wrong. There is no atrocity for which a “great” man can be accounted guilty…
…And it never occurs to anyone that to admit a greatness that is not commensurate with the standard of right and wrong is merely to admit one’s own nothingness and immeasurable puniness.
Leo Tolstoy War and Peace, Book IV, Part Three, Chapter 18.
In Greek, he is called “ho Megas Napoleontos”. (The Great Napoleon).
Well, if we cannot claim Columbus…