THE ULTIMATE SYMBOLISM OF BARTHOLOMEW’S FAILURES IN ONE PHOTO: In October 2023, Kasselakis visited the Phanar – at the same time as he was assisting Mitsotakis in passing the “Gay Marriage Bill” – and stated that the Patriarch invited him and his gay partner, Tyler, to the Phanar on the Epiphany!! (Link here)... This is a special gift to our “Archons”!! Shame on all of you!!!
ΕΑΝ ΠΡΟΤΙΜΑΤΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ ΠΑΤΗΣΤΕ ΤΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ ΣΤΟ ΚΑΤΩ ΜΕΡΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΘΟΝΗΣ
By Helleniscope’s Editorial Team
Patriarch Bartholomew’s latest visit to the United States confirms what we at Helleniscope have long asserted: there is nothing pastoral or Orthodox in his actions – just a series of self-congratulatory photo-ops, recycled rhetoric, and a blatant pursuit of money over Christ. Look at Karloutsos’ invitations to the so-called “Archons” (a title only meaningful in quotes – BECAUSE REAL “ARCHONS OF ORTHODOXY AND HELLENISM” ARE THOSE WHO STAND ON PRINCIPLE), where private events come with a price. Are these the actions of shepherds—or lobbyists? Are these the fruits of the Gospel—or profiteers presiding over Orthodoxy’s demise?
Why, we must ask, is his US itinerary published in Greek? Isn’t this America? Who is the audience here—the faithful in the pews, or a tiny clique in the Phanar’s echo chamber? Where are the parishes? Why are the people who support the Church invisible?
Based on his 10-day schedule, direct engagement with the faithful is almost non-existent—private dinners and meetings with the powerful are the focus. Only those who pay can see the “Green Patriarch”?

And why visit the Turkish Embassy in DC? Such visits never happened before his rise to the throne in 1991! Since then, he and his “Turkish Religious Institution” have acted as a branch of the Turkish Foreign Ministry, undermining Hellenism’s foundation—our Diaspora in America, Canada, Australia, and beyond.
And what of compassion? What of the Beatitudes? Poor Sophia Forchas, poor Charlie Kirk’s grieving family—do they hear words of consolation from the Patriarch? Or do they hear only slogans about the environment and disarmament? Why no mention of the assailants? Why is there no focus on the lost souls of our youth, abandoned in their hour of need?
This all comes just weeks after Bartholomew’s entanglement with the Mitsotakis Family mafia in Crete, where Bartholomew tried to push through their chosen candidate in Chania, against the Synod’s clear 8–0 vote and the will of the faithful. Since when does Orthodoxy bow to politicians instead of the Holy Spirit? Why are Synodical decisions thrown out by a corrupt hierarchy and even more corrupt political leadership?
Then there was his July 29, 2025, keynote at the World Council of Religions for Peace—a showcase of Masonic-style ecumenism, where Christ was never mentioned, and a vague “Common Sacred Worldview” was exalted. His failure to mention Christ—replacing Him with the “Luminous Void”—was blasphemous! This kind of syncretism strips Christianity of its uniqueness and risks turning the Church into a vehicle for globalist politics, not the Body of Christ.
Bartholomew will happily condemn guns, but never the murderers. He will rail about climate change, but never about the state of our souls. He will embrace the LGBTQx agenda not out of faith, but out of desperation to fill empty pews—pews that only grow emptier with his faithless actions. He will appear with heretical “theologians” at Fordham University, even bestowing part of his Templeton Prize on them—those plotting an LGBTQ ministry at St. Paraskevi Parish on Long Island. Is this the new “Orthodoxy”—or apostasy dressed up as progress?
The tragedy is this: if you ask 100 Greek Orthodox communicants in America to name their Patriarch, 70 will fail the test. How can a man be omnipresent in the media but absent in the lives of the faithful? How can he claim leadership when GOA membership has collapsed to just 125,000, down from nearly half a million two decades ago? What more evidence of failure do we need?
Even worse, America’s youth—thirsting for traditional faith—has abandoned Protestantism and Catholicism, seeking Orthodoxy for the Ancient Faith, only to find Bartholomew has abandoned Orthodoxy!!
But there are hopeful signs—some powerful parishes are starting to voice their concerns, and even the “Archons” are waking up.
This theater of the absurd must end. Finish the parade of empty gestures, the self-praise, and the political pandering.
Enough—leave America’s faithful in peace!
September 12, 2025, n.stamatakis@aol.com www.helleniscope.com
DISCLAIMER: The views and statements expressed in this article constitute constitutionally protected opinions of this author.
TO SUPPORT HELLENISCOPE OR BECOME A SUBSCRIBER, LINK HERE!!
BELOW HELLENISCOPE HAS AGGREGATED THE LIST OF BARTHOLOMEW’S SINS, HERESIES. AND FALLACIES. BUT IF YOU WANT THE COMPLETE LIST OF HIS “ACCOMPLISHMENTS,” PLEASE ENTER “PATRIARCH BARTHOLOMEW” IN HELLENISCOPE’S SEARCH BUTTON. IT’S QUITE EFFICIENT! AND A LOT OF READING!!
====================

The Comprehensive List of Patriarch Bartholomew’s Sins, Heresies, and Betrayals
(Prepared by Helleniscope’s Editorial Team)
I. Promoting Schism vs. “Unity of the Faith” within Orthodoxy
Rift with Athens:
Ceased Communion with Archbishop Christodoulos for several months over the “new Lands” dispute.
Chronic insistence that “new Lands” bishops must be approved by Constantinople.
Forcing the issue of a Stavropegial metohi in downtown Athens, under threats of ceasing Communion.
Rift with Jerusalem:
Jurisdictional fights; non-agreement on the Ukrainian “tomos.”
Rift with Antioch:
The Qatar bishop affair, which contributed to Antioch’s absence from Kolymbari.
Rift with Moscow:
Autocephaly for Ukraine, despite Bartholomew’s earlier letters affirming Kiev’s place in Moscow’s jurisdiction.
Flip-flopping on Philaret: from branding him a schismatic in 1992 and 1998, to legitimizing his followers in 2018.
Meddling in the Baltic States and even in China, where centuries of Russian missionary presence are ignored.
Rift with Serbia, Albania, Georgia:
All joined Antioch, Moscow, and Bulgaria in refusing Kolymbari 2016 due to Bartholomew’s agenda-rigging.
Interference in Montenegro and “Skopje,” violating Serbian jurisdiction.
Recent schisms within Alexandria, Cyprus, and Athens:
Surprise commemorations of Epiphanios of Kiev by Theodoros, Chrysostomos, and Ieronymos—without synodal consent—led to open schisms within their own synods.
Heavy-handed tactics against Esphigmenou Monastery:
This resulted in the entrenchment of schismatics and fueling the G.O.X. movement.
Division on Mt. Athos:
Pressure on abbots; schism over Epiphanios’ enthronement; monasteries refusing concelebration with clergy aligned to Kiev.
Rift within the Assembly of Canonical Bishops (USA):
Ongoing fractures are tied directly to Constantinople’s high-handed policies.
Ukraine as a deliberate provocation:
Despite letters from multiple patriarchates advising restraint, Bartholomew proceeded.
Helleniscope has documented his continued platforming of Epiphanius, including invitations to Constantinople for the Sunday of Orthodoxy, deepening the schism.
Renewed Ethnophyletism:
Moves in Estonia and elsewhere revive the specter of ethnophyletism condemned in 1872.
II. Dogmatic (Heretical) Provocations, Positions, and Actions
Ecumenist keynote without Christ (2025):
In a recent interfaith keynote in Constantinople, Bartholomew never once invoked Christ, instead exalting a “Luminous Void” alongside “Allah” and “Brahman.” Helleniscope denounces this as blasphemy and Masonic syncretism.
Kolymbari Council agenda-rigging:
Altered 50 years of agreements to push through Constantinople’s “modern” agenda, alienating entire churches.
Pope Benedict’s visit at the Phanar:
Canonical violations: Pope vested, seated on an Orthodox bishop’s throne, recited the Lord’s Prayer; Bartholomew exchanged the embrace and had the “pheme” chanted for him.
Common prayers, Iftars, and Uniate activities:
Regular participation in interfaith meals and prayers, erasing boundaries of Orthodoxy.
Parish grab:
Seizure of Ukrainian parishes abroad with no catechism or canonical process.
Tolerance and promotion of Elpidophoros’ heresies:
“Many spoons” communion, open communion for non-Orthodox spouses, public baptisms of children of a same-sex couple—all tolerated or rewarded by Bartholomew.
Fordham University / Public Orthodoxy support:
Promotion of revisionist theology: Filioque slip tolerated, ordination of deaconesses celebrated, essays on “theology of the erotic” circulated.
Global pan-religion activity:
Promotion of syncretist “common sacred worldview” initiatives that water down Orthodoxy.
III. Moral and Disciplinary Scandals
Paris “Bulgarian gay escort” scandal (2019):
Bulgarian Gay Escorts linked to theft inside the Metropolis of France. Instead of punishing the guilty hierarchs (Emmanuel of France, aide Maximos), Bartholomew promoted them. Helleniscope has repeatedly asked the Patriarch to call the French Police and request the “police report of the “Bulgarian Gay Escort” visit to the building of the Metropolis… He has refused to do so…
Cover-ups and rewards for moral lapses:
Repeated tolerance of clerical immorality, with promotions instead of sanctions.
IV. Governance, Finances, and Administration
Funding and “baksheesh” culture:
Helleniscope has documented how monies channeled to the Phanar disappear into a Turkish-style patronage system.
St. Nicholas Shrine fiasco:
Years of delays, opaque finances, and contradictions eroded trust. Despite official reassurances, the faithful remain unconvinced.
V. GOARCH and the American Front
Elpidophoros’ Baptism of same-sex couples’ children in Greece (2022):
Caused uproar among Greek hierarchs and Athonite monks. Bartholomew’s refusal to discipline Elpidophoros amounts to endorsement.
Progressive public statements:
A constant stream of ecumenist and liberal declarations was tolerated or amplified under Bartholomew’s watch.
Systematic erosion of Orthodox discipline in America:
From Holy Week liturgies with Catholic prelates addressing the faithful, to activist-driven theology published under GOARCH auspices, all tolerated and often celebrated by Constantinople.




There you have it, folks. Helleniscope has neatly collated a litany of the trespasses of the apostate patriarch of Istanbul. What are we to do, other than pray for Bartholomew’s repentance, apology and amendment of ways? And pray that we not slide into similar sins after his example? Are we to just wait until the old man goes the way of all flesh and his memory fades from public consciousness?
I say let Bartholomew’s hierarchical brethren deal with the man accordingly and depose him. Why? Because cowardly inaction in the face of Bartholomew’s heresies only serves to grant a tacit tolerance, if not downright approval of the reprobate’s actions. If the bishops don’t act decisively, the status quo will continue to be a stumbling block to the faithful who are unsure in their faith and expect that Bartholomew is a spiritual model to be emulated. I admit that I find the whole situation so repugnant I have no knowledge of any efforts underfoot to set things aright. If Helleniscope knows of any developments in that regard I would be happy to hear about them.
Lawrence,
Great thought on “…let Bartholomew’s hierarchial brethren deal with the man accordingly…”
However…
Unfortunately a large percentage of the “synod of sitting bishops” has been carefully selected to put “Loyalty and Unity with Bartholomew” first & above all cost, and place Unity of the Faith (avoidance of Schisms and Heretical teachings) and Unity with God on the back burner…
We have repeatedly discussed in the past clear case studies in Greece (and Cyprus and elsewhere) where an elderly Metropolitan or Archbishop dies, the people propose someone they feel worthy to lead them (according to the Scriptural Tradition in the book of Acts), only for the “Synod” to promote their own “favorite” to the Episcopacy. It is a violation of Canons and Orthodox Tradition to ignore or unjustifiably go against the will of the people in the election of bishops, and they have been aggressively perpetrating this violation for multiple decades to secure a corrupt “grip” on Ecclesiastical governance…some of them even appear to have “juicy files” that can be leveraged by external political interests (look at the recent Crete scandals, and several other cases of “violators” that were promoted instead of deposed in the past)…that’s exactly why the above list of “infractions” continues to grow…that’s what happens when a Synod of bishops is turned into a “Synod of collaborating enablers”…a.k.a. “ineffective, externally controlled puppets”.
The solution? Only the people waking up, exposing and deposing the corrupt imposters in “sheepskins”, and demanding change “en masse” can fix this situation…There are still many “able men” who have been sidelined for the episcopacy, so the Church will be fine if a much needed mass resignation / deposing of corrupt bishops were to occur in the future. You see how effective the revelation of scandals in the media is…after 50 years, even the corrupt Archbishop of Sinai was forced to resign, for example. It’s an effective approach…expose all of them in the media with full detail, so they won’t know what hole to crawl into to escape the public shame…”if you know something, it’s time to say something”…
Markos,
I appreciate your answer to comment. I turned sour on the Greek Orthodox Church while serving on the parish council of our local GOA parish from January 2020 through December 2021. It was deeply disappointing to watch Elpidophoros and our metropolitan, Gerasimos, capitulate to the medical zeitgeist and suppress the free exercise of our Orthodox sacramental worship, and to watch our parish leadership observe every jot and tittle of the draconian Covid guidelines.
It is even more discouraging to see that that heretic, Elpidophoros, stayed in office despite his several betrayals of our Faith. It has been disgusting to watch him bend over and kiss Bartholomew’s ass on several occasions. As a former Episcopalian and Anglican priest, I was particularly disgusted by Elpidophoros’ annual insistence that he celebrate his Turkish patron’s name day at the eponymous St. Bart’s Episcopal Church on Manhattan, Ground Zero for the “queering of Manhattan”. What an abomination! It irked me no end. I concluded that the whole American Greek hierarchy must be corrupt to the core.
Of course Elpidophoros obeisance to arch-heretic and schismatic Bartholomew serves to reinforce your point. I am not as aware as you are of how much brown-nosing goes on amongst the hierarchs outside of the GOA sphere because the whole damned affair just makes me sick to my stomach. Considering my age and health, I need to maintain a certain level of mental equilibrium so as to avoid a medical event.
Enough about me. Now, after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, I agree with you that the enemies within need to be weeded out, but I am also cognizant of Christ’s words to the disciples that they allow the tares to grow with the wheat until such time as the angels will separate them during the harvest. (Matthew 13:24–43) Elpidophoros and his patron, Bartholomew will have their comeuppance on That Day if they don’t repent Today.
If I may, I would like to contribute a word of caution about the election of hierarchs by the people. I understand the favorable canonical concept of selection of hierarchs by acclamation of the clergy and laity, but once you allow the naked exercise of democracy in ecclesiastical elections, you will reap an “apostolic succession” of heretics and sycophants such as we witnessed in the Episcopal Church. The most egregious case in point was that Jezebel Katherine Jefferts-Schori, who hounded orthodox (lower case) Episcopal bishops out of orders and sued departing conservative parishes to seize their properties.
The Naked Truth is presented here today in detail and with clarity.
Go gently into the night Mr. Bart.
Both Bart and Elpi have failed to gauge that America and its Greek Orthodox faithful have moved well beyond the silly priorities and agenda that they attempt to set for us.
They are stuck in 10th century Constantinople while we are dealing with modern families and issues.
The results of their leadership are fully evident. The pews are empty, the churches are in financial crisis, and the priests are fewer and less impressive than previous generations.
The scoring for Bart and Eloi is F in all courses. They flunked out of school and together they have set the GOA in a death spiral.
Bartholomew is not voluntarily leaving for several reasons. 1. He has the support of other like-minded Ecumenist and secular bishops that he helped appoint and who are loyal to him, 2. There is too much apostasy among the laity to care what he is doing in the Church, and 3. He does not live in Greece, he lives in Turkey as a Turkish citizen. I have long suspected he has been paying off the Turks for protection and/or permission to coexist with them. it becomes a very dysfunctional relationship when you function as the Episcopal overseer of a country or countries you don’t even live in.
According to Holy Tradition, an ecumenical synod is the meeting of all Bishops the world over. Ecclesially, his vote carries the same weight as everyone else’s, so what is the point of his throne, unless it’s only to abuse it and throw his weight around like a self proclaimed and fabricated first without equals? In a perfect world, every country should be autocephalous with primates chosen by the people, themselves. We need a return to Apostolic tradition, something which has greatly suffered due to greed and political ambition. Five Patriarchates was a good idea for the ancient world, but the world has changed. We need a better balance of power in the Church. In the body of Christ, every member is as special and unique as every other and every conscience should have a voice.
I can honestly say that I was never disgusted by a person more than I am by this man. Even the people in my life that have come and gone that hurt me or did me ill one way or the other, still did not disgust me more than this man that is causing so much destruction in so many ways, from the Ukraine situation to everything he does around the world.
Ο Τεκτονισμός αποτελεί θρησκεία και μάλιστα θρησκεία αντιΧριστιανική ;;;
Πόσοι κληρικοί έχουν ενταχθεί στον ΜΑΤΣ ;;;
Καιρός να ανανήψουν !!!
Nick- can a church that is currently under GOARCH breakaway and go under the Patriarchate of Jerusalem or ROCOR?
It can happen as parishes are usually non-profit legal entities. But it depends on their legal organization and their bylaws, it depends on state law and it usually is fought in courts. It is a rather complicated legal question. There are precedents in law. Every case is different. We will have to write a special article to answer it better.
Nick a more detailed article would be great!
Mario,
Helleniscope is correct that there are some complexities here, but at a super-high level, in order of “easiest” vs. “most difficult” paths, these are the options:
1) GOARCH lay-people “walk” with their wallets in hand and approach another jurisdiction that they trust to establish a parish in the same zip code.
2) Option 1 + negotiating a commitment by the new jurisdiction to provide clergy that will follow the Greek “typikon”. The Antiochans are theoretically the simplest to adapt to this sort of situation, because Antioch is a historically Greek jurisdiction. There is also historical precedent in ROCOR and even the Georgian Church, because there where always Greek-speaking parishes in the Pontian Regions of the Black Sea. Many Serbian clergy are also very familiar with the Greek typikon, too, in theory.
3) Option 1 + transferring existing buildings & assets. This is where the court battles that Helleniscope alluded to become nebulous in the US, depending which US Circuit courts are hearing the case.
4) Option 3 + transfer of clergy. There is only one jurisdiction that is open to consider acceptance of clergy from Constantinople without “permission” from the latter, and naturally Constantinople retaliates against those clergy 100% of the time…ironically however, Constantinople violates its own precedent and principles on this matter by accepting clergy such as Epiphanios and even Theophan (who recited the Filioque at his ordination as bishop)…That is definitely a “double-standard”.
Basically, clergy are historically treated as “indentured servants” by their Churches, and they can’t freely “move” jurisdictions, like lay-people can. Ironically, Constantinople has precedent in the diaspora, including with the Carpatho-Russians, and even the reported history of that parish in Taylor, PA is fascinating, because it is a clear case of “Option 4” being conducted by Constantinople…rumor has it that the “pastor” announced to the parish that he has found Orthodoxy, and he was accepted together with a large percentage of the parish (and the buildings)…
In short, there is definitely challenging case law that the secular courts would rely upon, but at the same time there are also “antithetical precedents” being perpetrated by those who would be going to court (could result in a “boomerang effect”) which are against the case law that they would be citing in court…it’s totally chaotic…no telling what might come out when anyone tries Options 3 & 4…
Anyway, that’s a high-level opinion/view of theoretical options as they would stand right now…
I found this article, I think is very good and gives us further inside in Barto’s brain.
https://spzh.eu/en/zashhita-very/88047-pat-bartholomew-i-was-wrong-about-ukraine-but-wont-correct-anything
One thing I find funny is that OCU has a new reputation, I have heard it from several sources: the church of crowbars and grinders. Well deserved, well deserved. Nice job, barto!